Sunday, August 4, 2013
August edition of the Oklahoma Workers' Monthly is available
To download a PDF copy of the print edition of the Oklahoma Workers' Monthly for August, please click here.
Sunday, July 21, 2013
July edition of the Oklahoma Workers' Monthly is available
To download a PDF copy of the print edition of the Oklahoma Workers' Monthly for July, please click here.
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
Low-Wage Strikes Starting to Improve Jobs
Reprinted from www.teamsternation.blogspot.com
A number of fast-food and retail workers say their jobs improved after they walked out on their employer in a wave of one-day strikes over the past few months.
Fast-food workers in Seattle walked out of dozens of restaurants on Wednesday night and Thursday, marking the seventh one-day strike in the past eight weeks. Low-wage workers have gone on strike in New York, Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis, Washington, D.C., and Milwaukee. Now the workers say they are seeing some improvement in their jobs after returning. The Huffington Post reports:
Conditions, hours, positions and pay have improved for a number of workers who participated in strikes in the last two months, organizers say. They point to Krystal Collins in Chicago, who got a 0.25 cent hourly raise and was switched from part-time to full-time after walking off her job at Macy's in April, and to Claudette Wilson, Romell Frazier and Khalil Dorris in Detroit, who forced their Burger King to close for the day in early May and subsequently saw their hours increase.
Here are a few more examples, brought to you by CNN Money.
Before the strike:
Before the strike:
Eddie Guzman needed to work at least 20 hours a week to be eligible for welfare programs, such as food stamps and affordable housing. But his requests for more hours at the Brooklyn Burger King were met with deaf ears. Guzman's managers kept his working hours between 12 and 15 a week. After the strike he was fired, but then: ...community organizers and New York city council member Brad Lander went to the Burger King (BKW) to ask for his job back... Within days, Guzman had his job back and was scheduled to work at least 20 hours per week.
Robert Wilson, a Chicago McDonald's employee, before the strike:
(He) spent eight years showing new employees the ropes and training others to get better positions at McDonald's. But he was never able to move up the ranks himself. That was until he and other workers rallied on Black Friday outside of the location where he worked in Chicago's Navy Pier. His managers saw Wilson protesting. The very next day, they told him that the position he had been gunning for was finally open.
One day longer, one day stronger!
Labels:
Labor,
Strike,
Unions,
workers,
Working Class
McCain and Obama Administration pledge support for Al-Qaeda Terrorists
![]() |
John McCain on his recent trip to Syria. Standing behind him is Mohamed Nour, a known terrorist
|
In preparation for plunging the US into another bloody and senseless war overseas, Sen. John McCain visited with Syrian “rebels” last month to pledge support in their campaign to overthrow the democratically elected government of Syria. For over 2 years, the “Free Syrian Army”, a disparate collection of Al-Qaeda linked jihadists and a handful of deserters from the Syrian Army, have waged an unremitting war of terrorist violence against the Syrian civilian population, sending out waves of suicide bombers and car bombs in Damascus and surrounding areas, as well as more conventional urban battles with the Syrian army. By far the most horrific attacks by the FSA were in Alleppo, where the jihadists used chemical weapons in their attack on March 19th.
The US has been supporting the attempt to overthrow the Syrian government since the beginning of the conflict, as the US has imposed economic sanctions on the Syrian state since 1975. Last year, the New York times revealed that the CIA had been funneling weapons to the opposition, despite a prior EU arms ban to either side in the region. The Obama Administration has openly supplied the “rebels” with over $250 Million in cash, as well as bringing in supplies, armored troop transports, and other “non-military” aid in the past two years. Now that the EU has lifted its arm embargo on the conflict, the US and its European NATO allies are planning to openly send weapons and air support to the Syrian Al-Qaeda forces.
By forcing the collapse of the Syrian government, the US will be able to deprive Iran of one of its strategic allies, and a destabilized region would allow US corporate industries to exploit the country’s resources without local government opposition. Syria is a major oil producer in the region, and according to the Oil and Gas Journal, Syria had 2,500,000,000 barrels of petroleum reserves as of January 2010.
Moore City Manager Eddy: Storm Shelters in Public Schools too “Costly”
Following the horrific aftermath of the EF-5 tornado last month, the second to hit the town in the past 14 years, the necessity for providing adequate storm protection in public schools and community shelters should be obvious, but as the ongoing debate in Moore city government proves, students could continue to be at risk for some time to come.
The majority of the debate seems to be raging on the topic of the site for the reconstruction of Park Plaza Elementary and Mayor Lewis’ campaign to require new home construction to include storm shelters, but other than School Superintendent Pierce’s expressing that she is “hopeful” that a saferoom will be included in the construction of the new school, there are no guarantees from the city government. There are no state requirements for storm shelters in schools and public buildings, and state emergency managers do not even track which schools are unprotected.
In a radio interview with NPR, when asked about safe rooms being required for schools, City Manager Steve Eddy replied, “Lives, you can't count the cost or the value of lives, but you can count the cost of construction. It adds a significant amount of cost to construction. The taxpayers would have to determine whether they're going to pay that or not.” The City of Moore had no qualms in allocating over $700,000 in corporate tax incentives to Target and IMAX theaters in 2012. Let’s hope the City considers children’s lives more valuable than corporate kickbacks, or the price could be much higher when the next storm hits.
Labor Unions Work to Bring Relief to Disaster-hit Families in Oklahoma
In a spirit of true solidarity, trade union locals and other organized labor groups from around the country are raising funds and collecting donations for families affected by the May 20 Tornadoes. Among the many efforts underway, here are a few examples of labor in action:
Oklahoma City IBEW local 1141 established a relief fund, and are collecting supplies to be donated to the relief effort.
On May 29th, the Central Oklahoma Labor Federation mobilized dozens of volunteers for cleaning up debris .
When Jim Pulley, a UAW member in Spring Hill, Tenn., saw the devastation caused by the tornadoes that hit Moore, Okla., he jumped into action and set up collection boxes at all of the General Motors Co. (GM) plant entrances in his hometown, resulting in three semi-trailer truckloads of supplies headed to help the tornado survivors.
Teamsters provided volunteers for driving forklifts to haul and manage the rapidly accumulating supplies donated to the Red Cross. Local 523 also set up trailers to collect member’s donations of food and supplies.
International Association of Fire Fighters Communications Director Tim Burn said first responders, including those from his union, are busy helping their neighbors in digging out and reassembling their lives after the May 20 tornadoes. But some 30 IAFF members are victims, too, he said. "Some 1,700 IAFF members are located in the path of the massive tornadoes that devastated Moore, Okla., and a number of other Oklahoma cities, as well as communities in Kansas. The international has begun damage assessments, and the need for relief to IAFF members affected by the storm is critical," he said.
The United Food and Commercial Workers and the National Association of Letter Carriers said members in Moore lost homes, goods and cars. UFCW said checks should go to Local 1000's regional headquarters in Grapevine, Texas. NALC President Fredric Rolando said his union's members should funnel contributions to Branch 458 through the union's Postal Employees Relief Fund. "When a storm like this hits, we must match its ferocity with our own generosity to help our brothers, sisters and co-workers rebuild after this tragedy," Rolando said.
These are just a few examples of the combined efforts of union brothers and sisters working together to help Oklahoma in its time of need. To find out more about what you can do to help, contact the Oklahoma State AFL-CIO at 405-528-2409 for more information.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
A Farewell to Arms, or a Workers’ Uprising?
A Response to the CPUSA National Committee’s statement on Gun Control
By Daniel Lee
A document bearing the headline “A statement by the CommunistParty USA” was recently emailed to CPUSA membership and email subscribers, as
well as posted on its website and social media. The “statement”, actually
issued by the national leadership at 23rd street in New York, titled
“The fight to curb gun violence is a working-class issue,” comes out like an
imperial edict or dictatorial decree. The “head honchos” have apparently
forgotten the democratic processes the Party has in place for decision-making. It
seems everything that comes from Sam Webb and his cronies are now considered infallible
ex cathedra, and instantly becomes
the official line of the party without discussion or room for dissent. Other
instances of this include Webb’s “unofficial” documents, such as “A Party of
Socialism in the 21st Century: What It Looks Like, What It Says, and What It
Does” which when it was published by Political Affairs carried the disclaimer -
“The following article represents the views of
its author alone. It doesn't necessarily reflect the official views of any
organization or collective.” – but somehow became set in stone, bronzed and lacquered, embossed and
covered in gold leaf as the Official Party Line, and any member who has spoken
out against it since has been labeled “anti-party”, “ultra-leftist”, and “does not represent any part of the Communist Party USA”.
Those of us who point out its blatant revisionism are immediately accused of “name-calling”
and being “dogmatic”. With this latest statement however, there is not even the
pretext of democracy. Any dissent or differences of view are not only
considered to be in violation of “Democratic Centralism”, but according to this
statement, are “supporting the enemies
of America’s working people.”
Moving on to the actual text of the message, however, shows
it to be a thinly-veiled attempt to link gun ownership to:
- Union busting
- “Attacking…Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security”
- Working to cut and privatize public education
- “Seek[ing] to slash accessible and affordable health care”
- “Oppos[ing] President Obama’s stimulus program to create millions of jobs and rebuild infrastructure”
- “Promot[ing] racism and attacks on the rights of women, immigrants, gays and lesbians.
- “Climate-change deniers who are backed by the fossil fuel industry.”
Did they miss anything? It seems that having a gun is
apparently the Original Sin which caused the fall of man! This ridiculous logical
fallacy of “guilt by association” is not only intellectually dishonest by even
an elementary schoolchild’s standards, but shows the desperation of the Webb
faction to scare the membership into following their every utterance blindly,
which is in complete disregard for the principles of Marxism-Leninism, and over
150 years of revolutionary Marxist history.
They point to the second amendment as having been “adopted
to enable the new American republic, lacking a standing army or state national
guards, to muster militia to put down domestic uprisings and repulse any
attempted return by the British. Which is what it did in repressing slave
revolts, Native Americans, and poor farmers during Shay’s Rebellion.” Should I
also point out that it was guns which enabled the champions of the people to
rise up and defend themselves, their families, and the oppressed, such as John
Brown’s Rebellion in 1859, whose actions brought to the forefront of the
American consciousness the need to abolish slavery?
Look, John Brown’s
holding a gun! He must be a racist!
Shay’s Rebellion itself in 1786 was an armed uprising led by trained ex-Army officers who attempted
to seize an armory for the purpose of securing more, you guessed it, weapons–
hardly the “nonviolent mass organization” of poor farmers the Webbites claim
them to be. Thomas Jefferson himself, in reference to the rebellion in a letter
to James Madison said “I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good
thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. Unsuccessful rebellions, indeed, generally establish the encroachments on the
rights of the people which have produced them. An observation of this truth
should render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of
rebellions as not to discourage them too much. It is a medicine necessary for
the sound health of government”, and “The tree of liberty must be refreshed
from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural
manure.”[i]
Native Americans also have been known to use guns to defend
themselves and their people against an Imperialist US government. In fact, had
they not used “military-grade” weaponry, they would have all been obliterated
long ago.
Definitely NOT Charlton
Heston.
From the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864 to the Wounded Knee
incident in 1973, Native Americans have needed weapons to defend themselves
against Federal and State “democratic” governments who have ordered their
murders, the abduction of their children, and the genocide of their peoples and
culture.
Here in Oklahoma, there was a Socialist uprising in 1917
called the Green Corn Rebellion. It was an uprising by white tenant
farmers, Seminoles, Muscogee
Creeks and African-Americans in response to the government’s
attempts to enforce a draft sending their young men to fight and die in an
Imperialist war. They were armed, and ready to defend themselves and their
people.
Union workers for over a century have had to be armed to
protect themselves against strike-breakers and police forces that brutalize and
murder their comrades and their families. The Ludlow Mine Massacre did not
happen because a group of miners sat down and sang “Kumbayah” – but rather
because the miners dared to defend themselves against attack, and held off the
strike breakers’ thugs and National Guard goons for months, before they were
finally massacred in the spring of 1914. However, their deaths paved the way for
many of the workers’ rights we have today.
The Black Panther Party is famously known for exercising
their second amendment rights and carrying weapons to demonstrate their ability
to defend their rights. In fact, it is their “bearing of arms” which caused the
NRA and the KKK to support stricter gun control laws! The Deacons for Defense
and Justice were another African American civil rights and defense organization
which were armed during the 1960’s throughout the South. While many do not remember
them today, the Deacons were instrumental in protecting African American
communities from brutal repression not only from the Klan, but also the US
government. According to Robert Hicks, a former civil rights leader and
activist in the Louisiana chapter of the Deacons for Defense and Justice:
“The Klan would drive through our neighborhood shooting at us, shooting into our homes, and the police wouldn't help. The black men in the community wouldn’t stand for it. You shoot at us, we shoot back at you. I’m convinced that without our guns, my family and many other black people would not be alive today.”
Of course, the reformist milksops cry, those armed uprisings
and rebellions were unsuccessful! They did not succeed in their aims, and the participants
were killed or imprisoned. Even the Deacons were investigated intensely by the
FBI, who cared nothing about the violence the black community faced from the
KKK. However, just because a particular
uprising is not successful, it does not mean that it was wrong. Rosa Luxemburg led
the workers in the Spartacist Uprising in 1919. Was she wrong for doing so because
the Social-Democrat government brutally murdered her and the other workers?
Even the Russian Revolution took over 20 years of agitation and unsuccessful
uprisings which resulted in hundreds of deaths for the workers to successfully
overthrow the Czar, and then, it took one more revolution for the Bolsheviks to
overthrow the “democratically elected” bourgeois government and establish the
worker’s Soviet state. Did they accomplish this by peaceful, “nonviolent mass
organization”? No! It took the sacrifice of many for the rest of the workers to
rise up as they saw their sons, daughters, mothers and fathers, neighbors and
friends bravely fighting and dying to liberate their fellow workers.
Flying in the face of these truly revolutionary examples,
the Webb faction thunders condemnation at those of us who honor the sacrifices
of workers past and seek to chart a course in their example –
“And we want to make this clear: Personal possession of
weaponry is not a revolutionary means to change the system in our country in
the 21st century, as some self-proclaimed “revolutionaries” and some extreme
right wingers claim. The great social changes that have transformed our society
in the modern era have come about through the nonviolent mass organization and
struggles of the American people. In unity there is strength. This is the way
forward to progressive change as well as the path to achieve more basic
transformation - a socialist society that is deeply democratic, egalitarian,
and at peace with the world.”
These outright lies are not only a complete repudiation of
revolutionary Marxist-Leninist principles, but do a grave disservice to all
those who fought and died for workers freedoms here in the US and around the
world. Standing in sharp contrast are the very words of the Communist Manifesto
–
“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims.
They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible
overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at
a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their
chains. They have a world to win.”
I choose the side of the “self-proclaimed ‘revolutionaries’”
such as John Brown, Marx, Lenin, Che Guevara, and Huey Newton. Whose side are
you on?
[i] The
results of Shay’s rebellion, which though it was put down, influenced the
adoption of the US Constitution and the necessity for a Bill of Rights to
protect people (at the time, white male property owners) against undue
encroachment from the government on personal liberties – including gun
ownership.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





