Friday, November 2, 2012
Friday, October 19, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
.jpg)
Sunday, August 5, 2012
TULSA MAYOR BRANDS PUBLIC WORKERS “UNSAFE”:
Tulsa World acts as management’s mouthpiece
By Daniel Lee
Mayor Dewey Bartlett continued his war against Public
workers last week, using the local newspaper as his platform to slander city
workers. Bartlett is quoted in a Tulsa World article (July 30, “City of Tulsa's
'weak safety culture' costs millions in employee injuries, claims” by Randy
Krehbiel) as stating that public employees have a “weak safety culture”, after
city management ordered a $71,000 safety report from DuPont “Sustainable
Solutions” which gave the city a score of .9 on a 0-5 safety scale. The article
also contains numerous graphs and statistics with such statements as
“Eighty-four percent of those surveyed said they ‘have had no involvement at
all with any safety activities.’” It certainly paints a bleak picture, offering
staggering figures of injuries and Workers’ Compensation claims, lack of
accountability and unsafe work practices.
What the article fails to mention is that AFSCME
International, and Tulsa Local 1180, have repeatedly offered to conduct safety
training classes for the past 5 years, but the proposals have been rejected
each time by city management. In fact, the city has been stonewalling all
safety requests made by the union submitted in the City Safety and Health
Management Committee, which was originally designed to be a forum for workers
and management to come together in a non-adversarial atmosphere to work out
issues related to such matters. Union local president Mike Rider told the Oklahoma
Workers Monthly that the union has been repeatedly requesting OSHA-rated safety
eyewear for the workers, which would cost approximately $60 per pair, but has
been turned down each time for over a year by the management on the committee. Yet, despite claims of “budget shortfalls”,
the mayor spent $71,000 on the DuPont report. This is the same DuPont,
incidentally, which has been repeatedly fined by the EPA for toxic waste
dumping - endangering over 7 million people’s lives in the areas around their chemical
plants – and has a well-documented history of union busting, health and safety
violations, and created an industrial disaster in India, using local police to
suppress protesters and murder a 25 year-old activist.
The reporting by the Tulsa World was clearly-one sided and
designed to paint public workers in the worst light possible. When contacted by
the Oklahoma Worker’s Monthly about the article, Tulsa World writer Randy
Krehbiel admitted that he had not even bothered to contact the union about the
issue, and had approached the article believing the underlying issue to be the
falsification of workers’ compensation reports and fraud by city workers.
Krehbiel was urged to contact the union’s president and get both sides of the
story. The next day, an editorial was published by Tulsa World staff editors,
restating the need for safety issues to be addressed, citing the lack of
accountability as the problem. There was no mention of AFSCME’s attempts to set
up safety training or the most basic of safety equipment requests being denied
by city management.
Bartlett’s attack on union workers comes as no surprise. In
2010, Bartlett commissioned an efficiency review by KPMG, an auditing and
efficiency consulting firm, to study and recommend areas to cut costs and
“increase efficiency” in city government and services. KPMG, it may be noted,
is a multi-national corporation whose influence reaches into the upper levels
of US, British, and European government, and was indicted in 2005 for creating
fraudulent tax shelters for wealthy clients. The report was used by Bartlett to
create a push to cut city services and base an argument for privatization of
city contracts, one of the points suggested by the KPMG report. With the jobs
of hundreds of workers in the crosshairs, Tulsa city employee union members
worked together to create a plan which both cut costs and increase efficiency,
and successfully had their contract renewed. Even Mayor Bartlett at the time
(as of March, 2012) thanked the city workers on their saving the city $224,000
since last year. However, he had not given up on his war against public
workers.
In June, Bartlett
presented a city budget which he pretentiously called “The Budget of
Collaboration” to the Tulsa City Council, which among other things, included
spending over $800,000 on “consultants” such as DuPont, but cut raises for city
union workers, many of whom are forced to rely on public assistance to make
ends meet. When city workers showed up at a city council meeting on June 14th
to speak out against the betrayal of their interests and the forced hardship on
their families, Bartlett stood up in the middle of their message and walked
out. This of course was not reported in the Tulsa World. The newspaper’s
headline four days later about the meeting: “Tulsa City Council goes to work on
mayor's budget proposal”. No mention about city workers holding up their food
stamp cards and pleading to be given enough money to feed their families, or
the dismissive and autocratic mayor getting up and walking out during one
impassioned worker’s speech.
This latest stunt with the DuPont report is merely an
attempt by Bartlett and his union-busting cronies to portray public workers as
dangerous, costly, and criminally negligent. And it has worked. Online comments
to the story already clamor for privatization and speculate wildly about
workers compensation fraud with ridiculous anecdotes which slander the work and
sacrifice of our public servants that build our roads, keep our water clean,
fight our fires and protect our streets; the city workers who are the backbone
of our cities. The Tulsa World has given Mayor Bartlett the soapbox he craves,
acting as his personal PR team and refusing to report anything which
contradicts the narrative he is pushing. Their reporting resembles something
more like propaganda than independent media. One wonders whatever happened to
“freedom of the press.” And while they fete his accomplishments, another public
worker’s family checks how much money is left on their food card to try to make
it to the end of the month, wondering how much longer they might have a job.
Party members and Labor supporters are urged to Call Tulsa AFSCME 1180 and show your
support! 918.584.0334
Then call the Mayor's action line (918) 596-2100 to protest
his attempt to CRUSH WORKERS RIGHTS.
UPDATE: To Tulsa World writer Randy Krehbiel's credit, a followup story was run Sunday August 5th, featuring an interview with AFSCME Local 1180 President Mike Rider, commenting on the situation, and giving the union's side of the story. Mr. Krehbiel should be commended for his pursuing journalistic integrity, despite the Tulsa World's track record of report first, ask questions later.
Muskogee Workers Successful in fight against Privatization, Win back Collective Bargaining Rights
By Charles McCune
A long, hard fight was won by Muskogee City workers last
month to restore collective bargaining rights and restore city recognition of
their union, AFSCME Local 2465. The move comes as a ray of hope in a year which
has seen repeated defeats across the nation for public sector workers and the
push to crush workers’ rights.
At the same time that Wisconsin lay in a pitched battle over
collective bargaining rights for public employees last year, city officials in
Muskogee, Oklahoma were pushing plans of their own to crush workers’ rights,
and outsource local public employees’ jobs. What they had not counted on was
the collective power of the workers, fighting for their livelihoods and the
rights of workers everywhere.
Following the signing into law of the bill repealing the
Oklahoma Municipal Employee Collective Bargaining Act in April 2011, Muskogee
City Manager Greg Buckley began to work to press the Muskogee city council to
de-recognize the city employee’s union, AFSCME Local 2465, telling the council
that the majority of city workers did not want or care about union
representation. In June of last year, city councilors voted to end the
collective bargaining rights for 186 of the city’s 480 employees. To add insult
to injury, they also began to consider plans to privatize the city waste water
treatment plant, which would have ended over half of the public worker’s jobs
in the plant, outsourcing to a non-local management company. Upon hearing of
the plan to undermine their livelihoods, the plant workers and members of
AFSCME local 2465 took action.
The bid being considered by the city was from Veolia, a
French water management company, and would have cost the city $800,000. The
city workers knew that they, as American workers and native Oklahomans, could
more effectively manage the plant than a foreign-based multi-national
corporation could, so they wrote their own “Request for Proposal”. John Reeves, a plant operator at the water
facility and proud union member remarked upon being
asked about the proposal, “Had the city adopted our plan,
taxpayers would have saved $200,000.” The proposal was brought to Buckley, who
immediately shot it down. Undaunted, the public workers presented their RFP to
city council, voicing their opposition to outsourcing on the basis that they
could manage efficiency and costs more effectively. “We’re the ones that do the
work. We know where we can create efficiency and we know how to save the
taxpayer’s money,” said Dustin Williams, local 2465 member, to a packed city
council meeting in September 2011. As a direct result of the public worker’s
arguments, the city council stopped the outsourcing attempt in a 4-5 vote, but
the city manager still refused to accept the workers’ proposal.
Having successfully won the battle against privatizing the
waste water plant, the city workers set their sights on restoring collective
bargaining rights in the city. A historic coalition of solidarity was formed
between AFSCME and members of the police and firefighters unions, military
veterans, pastors of local congregations in the NAACP, and Muskogee County
Democrats. With their contract with the city set to expire on October 31, 2011,
union members began a drive to build union membership within their workplaces
and present an appeal to the city council, showing the city leadership that the
workers did in fact want union representation. As Dustin Williams, a Parks and
Recreation worker, told the local Muskogee Phoenix newspaper, “I would hope the
City Council will see employees do want a union,” Williams said. “And we are
willing to fight for that right.”
In a city council meeting in October, councilors voted 8-1
to approve the drafting of a city ordinance which would allow the return of
collective bargaining if city workers petition to have their union status
re-recognized. Muskogee Mayor John Tyler Hammons agreed to draft the proposal
and return it to be voted on in December. In the meantime, however, city
workers would lose their official union representation. At the time, the union
supporters heralded the decision as a victory:
“We’re just tickled to death that the working man has won the right to
bargain collectively with the city,” commented Muskogee County Democrat Party
chairman Dennis Wilhite. However, when the mayor’s draft came back and was
approved by city council on December 12th 2011, the union members were less
than pleased. Despite opening the possibility for the restoration of collective
bargaining rights, the ordinance placed unusual and stringent requirements to
bring them back – as reported in the Phoenix: “The ordinance requires the
support of 30 percent of the city’s estimated 180 non-uniform employees to
petition the city for an election. If an election is set, more than half of the
eligible employees would have to vote in favor of representation. Any employee
who fails to cast a ballot would be considered to have voted against union
representation.” Until such a petition was passed, and elections held, the
union would remain unrecognized. AFSCME
Organizer Matt Jordan called the measure a “slap in the face” to city workers, stating
that it goes against more than 40 years of contract negotiation with the city.
The union immediately set to work, organizing the petition
among city workers to hold an election. Over 100 employees out of the 186
non-uniformed workers filled out cards stating they wished to be represented by
a union. In the meantime, a closely-fought city council race resulted in the
victory of 3 pro-union candidates in the April 3rd 2012 runoffs. Following this
good news, the new Muskogee city council met in June to revisit the city
ordinance passed in December, which Councilor Kenny Payne stated was “not even
close to being acceptable”. After some
deliberation, the council struck the part of the ordinance which counted non-voting
employees as voting “no” to union representation, and moved the dates public
employees could petition for an election from November – July to July –
November, giving the workers the chance they needed to organize a collective
bargaining vote this year.
On July 15th, 2012, the day the collective bargaining
ordinance went into effect, city workers filed their petition for a recognition
election, exceeding the required number in the ordinance: “Over 55% of the
employees signed the petition, even though we only needed 30%,” said Roscoe
Beasley, a sanitation worker and union member. After the city clerk certified
the petition on July 23rd, the Muskogee city council set the recognition vote
for August 9th , 2012. A successful vote will mean that Muskogee workers once
again will enjoy union protection for their job security, wages and benefits,
and safer working conditions.
A victory for workers in Muskogee is a victory for workers
across the nation, and will set an example in the battles being fought for
American public workers’ rights . To quote Dustin Williams, “We’re not just
fighting for our workplace rights - we’re fighting for our children and their
future. We are fighting for the very survival of the [working] class. Everyone
should have the same rights and a voice.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)